|
| 


Re: efto ads
Posted by: HST on 10/06/11
I was a teacher under the Harris government. I KNOW there is a
difference and I don't ever want to go back there. Maybe I'll vote
Conservative once I retire.
If Hudak gets elected, there won't be literacy coaches, PD workshops,
prep time and special assignment teachers. Fortunately, I think that
due to the incredible work of all of the education unions (and many
others) that the Liberals will retain a majority government. The
funny thing about unions is they help all of their members even the
ones who vote Conservative.
HST
On 10/05/11, hi wrote:
> You really have no point since all of the parties are the same and
> will do the same when elected.
>
> For some reason, people still believe the parties are different and
> that one will save the day--save the world. Well I have news for
> you, it simply isn't true.
>
> This is all about entitlement...my turn now to be King...that is
> all.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/04/11, HST wrote:
>> No one would expect their union dues to be used to enhance
>> classrooms. It's bad enough that many teachers spend their own
>> money on their classrooms.
>>
>> I do agree that I don't like the ads, but I guess they are what
>> the elected ETFO executive decided to do to help keep the Tories
>> from winning. It may work whether teachers like the ads or not.
>>
>> HST
>>
>>
>> On 10/01/11, Hi wrote:
>>> You would be baffled to learn how much these ads cost. You
>>> must also include the time they are played as well. That $
>>> could go to hiring more teachers, enhance classrooms with
>>> new resources, house 3-4 new computer labs.....get my
>>> drift..
>>>
>>> What an entire waste of teachers union dollars....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/01/11, Nancy wrote:
>>>> These ads are a complete disaster. I have had parents
>>>> and even my own family
>>>> members ask me, "What the h**l is the
>>>> message?" Most people, myself included are
>>>> confused by them. As an OECTA member, I'd be furious if
>>>> my money was spent on such an ineffective campaign.
>>>> Don't get me wrong, OECTA isn't perfect, but I'm not a
>>>> member of ETFO and want to make that clear.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/20/11, . wrote:
>>>>> ETFO does not listen to it's membership. It meets the
>>>>> needs/desires of the executive. Just because
>>>>> something "grabs your attention" doesn't
>>>> make
>>>>> it a good thing. If I saw a person getting struck by
>>>>> a car, it would grab my attention - I would be
>>>>> horrified by what I saw, but I would be drawn to it.
>>>>> The people in the executive tend to be die-hard
>>>>> unionists who are far removed from the ideology of
>>>>> many of the members. Their response - join the
>>>>> executive - no thanks
Posts on this thread, including this one
- efto ads, 9/05/11, by m chown.
- Re: efto ads, 9/05/11, by mm.
- Re: efto ads, 9/07/11, by David.
- Re: EFTO ads, 9/07/11, by David.
- Re: EFTO ads, 9/09/11, by eva.
- Re: efto ads, 9/16/11, by Luba.
- Re: efto ads, 9/18/11, by Sandra Arlein.
- Re: efto ads, 9/18/11, by Margaret.
- Re: efto ads, 9/20/11, by Hi.
- Re: efto ads, 9/20/11, by ..
- Re: efto ads, 10/01/11, by Nancy.
- Re: efto ads, 10/01/11, by Hi.
- Re: efto ads, 10/04/11, by HST.
- Re: efto ads, 10/05/11, by hi.
- Re: efto ads, 10/06/11, by HST.
|